Genotype or Geno-hype?
Winnipeg, Manitoba, May 19, 2004

If scientists and journalists are really at odds over how to communicate with each other, what can be done?

It's necessary, if not vital, for scientists and journalists to talk to and understand each other. This leads to informed and intelligent debate. It's also important for policy makers because this leads to policies and laws that are well crafted and relevant.

Timothy Caulfield says this is seen as very important in other countries. In response, there is a move to help scientists and journalists understand and talk to each other. "In many European countries this has become a very serious issue. France and the United Kingdom have set up institutes to educate scientists in how they work with the media and also how the media works with scientists."

Véronique Morin says there are only two places in Canada where universities teach science journalism: Carleton University and Université Laval. "At the Canadian Science Writers' Association, we're in discussion with the Banff Centre to set up a science journalism course for working journalists who want to get acquainted with basic scientific terminology and with statistics and risk."

Alexandra Paul says it's also up to members of the public to make their views known. Only through direct contact with readers, viewers and listeners can the media correct itself and take action. "The only way media is going to find that out is if you say so. If the level of discussion is too simple, if you're not getting the information you want, then demand the media do a better job."